|
Reef Damage
On 5/04/03, Vone Research continued its monitoring of the
coral restoration project. First we dove site #27. Still nothing has been done
here. The hard corals are dying. Next we dove the area with dredge teeth. They
are still there. Next we dove side #37. The hard coral on this side is looking
considerably better than the first time we reported about it. There's an
obvious lack of soft coral attachment on this site. Next we went to site #54.
This will probably be one of the monitoring sites because some work has
recently been done here.
I want to believe that everyone getting this e-mail chose this career because
they wanted to make a difference.
For some unknown reason, we are not being given even the basic information
that we have been asking for. We just found out that the Hillsboro Inlet
district has completed the reef repair work. To add insult to injury, I have
been told " They should complete this work
before March 1st". This means we've done a lot of worthless
research dives and wasted a lot of valuable volunteer time because someone
didn't feel that it was necessary to tell us that the repair work was finished
or give us the report we had been asking for. Ok now we will stop asking and
file a public records request.
We tried to avoid this disaster which we believe does compare with the
atomic submarine that ran aground about ten years ago. The big difference is
the amount of substrate damage and the acreage. Oh, yes, one other thing : the
captain of the submarine was not told repeatedly that he is damaging reef. The
first damage was discovered on 7/ 19/ 2002. The next damage was discovered on
11/16/02. It was approximately 520'x130'. Over the next few weeks we reported
3/8 of a mile of damage which did not include area #22 which we believe to be
the largest area. On 12/01/03, we videotaped the subcontractor for Weeks
dragging cable over the reef . This damage did not stop until we went to the
media.
Now we're being told they made a mistake. Someone should be asking," Why
wasn't floating cable in the specifications for the job." We have been
told that this is an industry accepted standard procedure. Why was nothing
done when we reported the first damage areas? We find it quite alarming that
Tim Blankenship of CSI would withhold reports from Broward County so that we
would not be able to get them. ( see email below ) This situation has been
minimized from the beginning. We're not just reading the reports, we are
diving the sites. It took Steve Higgins and David Stout to get Tim Blankenship
to give us the datum that was used so we could find the smaller impact areas.
What is happening here is criminal and it's not, it should be. Is CSI making
money on repairing the reef they were supposed to protect? Maybe that's why
they would not use volunteers. I don't know but I will find out. As I stated
before, the repair work being done is of high quality. They just stopped too
soon. Per the HEA, the reef will recover in 8 to 35 years. I cannot help but
wonder how many of us will still be around? Impacted areas reduced from
116,361 to 35,467. I just cannot believe it . But very conveniently, we do not
have any maps or reports depicting the size of the impacted areas.
Will CSI be fined for dumping dredge teeth on the reef? Are we going to allow
contractors to destroy our reefs knowingly? Are we going to look the other way
when acres of our precious reef are impacted and say," What a great
learning experience!" Vone Research, Inc. will not. I guess site #27 will
just die.
Stephen Attis
Vone Research, Inc.
( Email )
From: "Timothy K. Blankenship" <tblankenship@coastalsystemsint.com>
Date: Fri Apr 4, 2003 8:56:13 PM US/Eastern
To: "LESLEY HUGHES" <LEHUGHES@broward.org>
Subject: RE: 32204 - Hillsboro Inlet Reef Restoration Spreadsheet
Lesley,
All of the information has been incorporated into a GIS that will be
circulated to the agencies next week. We had some technical problems
trying to get the photos incorporated, but I think we finally have the
bugs worked out. I also had to wait until NCRI finished their last
control transects for one of the SHP files. I am reluctant to send out
the detailed spreadsheets because then local interest groups start
manipulating the data, questioning the datum, numbers, etc.
Tim
|
|
|